Blog / Clients Successes

Reclaiming One Man’s Future through Shareholder Dispute Resolution

September 20, 2018

Business thrives on promises made with good intentions and integrity. When those promises are committed to signed documents, they become contractual obligations that compel the parties to live up to their promises even though good intentions and integrity may wane.

When promises made in good faith are subsequently discarded in the wake of ego and personal conflict, it’s likely that business disputes will arise. Sometimes those disputes can be resolved with calm reasoning, but often, litigation is needed instead.

Promises lead to shareholder dispute

James* was a young and successful corporate counsel when he was recruited by a fledgling beauty-services franchise company. At first, James was hesitant to leave his corporate position (and take a salary cut in doing so), but the promise of partial ownership was enough to lure him into taking a chance.

James’s primary job was to attract new investors, and he did his job well. Within his first year, James attracted several new investors and the franchise opened a half-dozen new outlets. Sam*, the company’s founder and majority owner, was so impressed with James’s performance that he increased the ownership incentive from three to five percent. As prospects exponentially grew, the franchise took off.

During this time, Sam was in dispute with the company’s former owner, and assured James that they would complete the proper ownership paperwork once that dispute was resolved. Being young and eager to succeed in his role, James trusted Sam’s word.

Then one day, out of the blue, James was fired—and he was denied any percentage of ownership for his contributions to the company’s growth.

He hired us to represent him in this business dispute resolution.

Promises and paperwork

Sam denied James the ownership share he had earned based on the claim that he had not signed a “unit grant agreement,” a document that would have set forth a vesting schedule for James’s units. Without that signed document, Sam contended, James had no rights of ownership.

We disagreed. James had signed an operating agreement when he first joined the company, and he had met the performance criteria to be granted five-percent ownership.

We began with a demand letter, seeking only to negotiate a reasonable settlement. The owner essentially told us to go fly a kite.

Shareholder dispute requires arbitration

The case involved years of arbitration. Sam and his franchise group did everything they could to deny James’s right to ownership.

The case became more complicated when the company was purchased by a private equity firm. No portion of the sale was designated to James, who should have received five percent of the asset sale in cash or stock.

In 2010, we filed for arbitration that didn’t begin until 2015, and then took two years to complete. The case required extensive discovery on our part, including tracking down the company’s prior attorneys and getting testimony from them supporting the claim that the promise of ownership had, in fact, been extended to James.

Ultimately, the arbitrators agreed with our position and granted James a cash equivalent of five percent of the asset purchase, plus court and attorney fees. It was vindication for the work James had done for the company—and fulfillment of the promises that had been made to him.

Years could have been saved with a signature

In the end, James won his case and received the equity value he had earned. But it came at a steep personal price. For five years James struggled to find employment, as his reputation had been extensively damaged by his former partner. Having left a secure job for this opportunity, he faced the challenge of having to reevaluate his career path.

Had a unit grant agreement been completed and executed prior to James joining the company, he very well could have avoided the civil litigation that was necessary for him to be awarded his promised share.

New partnerships often come with the glow of optimism, opportunity, and trust. Unfortunately, that glow can fade with time and with the intrusion of personality conflicts, sometimes driven by greed or jealousy. The best protection against broken promises is to be sure to get all the necessary documents signed before entering into an employment or a business arrangement.

If issues arise regarding a business or shareholder dispute and you suspect that you may have been victimized, contact the Ohio civil litigation attorneys at Cooper & Elliott. We are here to help.

*Names in this article have been changed to protect our client’s privacy. 

The outcome of any client’s case will depend on the particular legal and factual circumstances of the case.

Latest Blog Posts

March 11, 2021

Legal Action Can Help Sexual Abuse and Malpractice Victims Heal

Individuals who seek therapy are often in a vulnerable place in their lives. They choose to consult a professional because they recognize they are struggling to confront an issue on their own. During this process of healing, patients often disclose details about their lives that they have never discussed openly before. It should be automatic …

Continue reading “Legal Action Can Help Sexual Abuse and Malpractice Victims Heal”

February 11, 2021

Cooper Elliott Partners with the Brady Center, Leading to Sweeping Policy Changes for a Major Gun Retailer.

In 2016, Gerri Galliher’s son, Bryan, was tragically murdered by a man who illegally purchased a black powder revolver from Cabela’s. Added to her grief was a profound sense of shock—shock that the killer, who was a violent convicted felon, was so easily able to purchase a deadly weapon. Gerri wanted answers, and she wanted …

Continue reading “Cooper Elliott Partners with the Brady Center, Leading to Sweeping Policy Changes for a Major Gun Retailer.”

February 3, 2021

Ohio Leading the Way in COVID-19 Business Interruption Lawsuits

Many businesses that suffered losses during the COVID-19 pandemic have filed claims under their insurance policies. Unfortunately, even though these businesses paid hefty premiums to insure themselves against “business interruption” losses, insurance companies are denying these claims almost across the board for reasons we believe to be inappropriate. As a result, nearly 1,500 lawsuits have …

Continue reading “Ohio Leading the Way in COVID-19 Business Interruption Lawsuits”