Cooper & Elliott Blog

When Is It Time for Civil Litigation?

Posted on Tue, Jan 13, 2015 @ 1:33 PM

Sometimes the best solution to a difficult situation is no litigation at all. Even in a child-abuse case – one of the worst kinds of personal injury cases – going to court might not be the most effective way to resolve an issue and help the family.

That’s another thing people don’t always understand: When a case finally does go to court, the primary goal is not to punish somebody who’s done wrong. It’s to make sure a family can put its life back together.

Ryan’s story

Three-year-old Ryan* attended a private, church-operated preschool. When he left the school one day, his parents noticed red marks across his backside. It looked like he’d been hit, and Ryan didn’t want to talk about it.

With encouragement from his parents, Ryan finally told them what had happened. A parent volunteer at the preschool had repeatedly hit his bare backside hard with a ruler, leaving the marks.

Ryan’s parents went to the school to ask what happened. They were stonewalled: the school told them nothing had happened. When Ryan’s parents continued asking questions, the school headmaster said they’d be cited for trespassing if they came around again. All Ryan’s parents wanted was to know what had happened to their son.

So Ryan’s parents called Cooper & Elliott. We advised them that it wasn’t time for civil litigation yet, but they should get Child Services involved. The investigator Child Services assigned, however, turned out to be a member of the church that operated the school, which clearly tainted the investigation.

The police got involved, but detectives couldn’t get anyone, including the parent volunteer, to admit to any wrongdoing. The church circled the wagons, made certain its employees told the same story, and got a doctor to say that the marks on Ryan’s body were probably some kind of reaction to a cleaning agent used on toilet seats. With that element of reasonable doubt, the police and the prosecutor weren’t willing to pursue the matter, and the investigation ended.

Throughout all of this, Ryan was having a hard time after the beating he had received. Even though his parents had immediately removed him from the preschool, he was afraid to be left alone, and he’d gone back to wetting the bed. Ryan’s mom, Angela*, also felt horribly guilty. She believed that if she’d been a stay-at-home mom instead of sending Ryan to preschool, none of this would have happened. So she quit her job to be with her kids, even though it put a dent into the family’s income.

The only avenue left now was the civil justice system, where we could obtain school documents, take depositions, and find out for certain what had happened to Ryan.

What civil litigation accomplished for Ryan’s family

Our investigation revealed troubling things. We discovered that the church didn’t have the incident reports and other documents they’re supposed to keep in cases like this. Even more disturbing, we learned that another child got a fractured skull while the classroom was being monitored by the same parent volunteer who allegedly hit Ryan.

So we went to the church with a settlement offer. We asked them to pay for anger management counseling for this parent volunteer; we asked them to institute an ongoing child abuse awareness program for their teachers; and we asked for money to cover counseling for Ryan. The total value of what we wanted was a few thousand dollars, which seemed more than reasonable in view of the harm.

They turned us down flat. After Angela quit her job and more time had elapsed, we added an additional request: we asked them to pay for Angela’s lost income to resolve the situation once and for all. They turned us down again. That left us no choice but to take the church to court.

After hearing what had happened to Ryan and what the church had done afterwards, the jury awarded Ryan and his family compensatory damages, punitive damages, pain and suffering, and lost wages – all told, more than five million dollars. The case allowed Ryan to obtain counseling and for Angela to stay home with her son – and even start a business – without hurting the family’s finances.  The decision also sent a strong message that the community will not tolerate the type of behavior the church exhibited.

This was a family that did everything by the book. They didn’t rush to court. They went to the school first, then to a government agency, then to the police. Frequently, that’s the advice we give, and not just in child-abuse cases. Sometimes the civil justice system shouldn’t, or can’t, be brought into play. But when people pursue appropriate channels and nothing happens, or if the system breaks down along the way, that’s when civil litigation offers the best way to make things right.

*Names in this article have been changed to protect our client’s privacy. 

The outcome of any client’s case will depend on the particular legal and factual circumstances of the case.


Connect with us

Ginny Lefever Appointed to Board of Life After Justice

Posted on Fri, Jan 9, 2015 @ 8:20 AM

As a long-time supporter and fan of Ginny Lefever, we want to take this opportunity to congratulate her on her appointment to the board of Life After Justice

Founded by exonerees Jarrett Adams and Antoine Day, Life After Justice is a nonprofit organization dedicated to assisting wrongfully convicted men and women rebuild their lives after being released from prison. The organization provides a comprehensive suite of services for the wrongfully convicted. They assist exonerees in areas of housing, legal, vocational training and rehab, with a holistic approach to medical, dental and mental health services including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance abuse issues.

Ginny has taken a role on the board of this organization to provide a woman’s perspective, and to ensure the organization addresses the unique re-entry challenges faced by female exonerees. Like with everything Ginny does, we know that her contributions to Life After Justice will help countless people heal.

Topics: ,

Connect with us

How One Personal Injury Case Changed Lives Across Ohio

Posted on Tue, Dec 30, 2014 @ 2:07 PM

One memorable personal injury case involved Maureen and Rick Evans*, who got into a seemingly mild car accident one day. It was the kind of thing that could happen to anybody – a low-impact bump. The other driver was at fault, but it seemed like no big deal. Maureen hit her head on the passenger door and felt a little dazed, but she seemed unhurt otherwise and didn’t feel like she needed to go to the hospital.

No one knew at the time that Maureen had actually suffered a traumatic brain injury. After a few weeks, it became clear how serious her injury was. She had trouble getting out of bed. She couldn’t be in a lighted room. She developed short- and long-term memory problems. She eventually spent years in cognitive rehabilitation re-learning to read – and even to think – the way she once had been able to.

A spouse’s love vs. a state law

When Cooper & Elliott joined Maureen’s team, we faced several challenges. The first obstacle was the insurance company’s insistence that the accident hadn’t been serious, and that none of Maureen’s problems surfaced until long afterward. The second obstacle was even bigger, and it had major implications for Maureen, Rick, and every other Ohio couple involved in a personal injury case.

Because Maureen was injured so severely that she could no longer take care of herself, Rick made the difficult decision to quit a lucrative job to care for his wife. We wanted to make sure Rick would be compensated for what he had given up – after all, Ohio law would have allowed compensation for hiring outside nursing help for Maureen.  But Ohio law didn’t allow someone who wanted to personally care for his injured spouse to force the wrongdoer to pay for the income the caregiver would lose.

That didn’t seem right.

After much persistence and through a ruling by the Ohio Supreme Court, we were able to establish that if one spouse must forego earning a living to take care of the other spouse, the caregiver is entitled to the reasonable value of the nursing services for the care provided, including the income lost while doing so.

Because of this ruling, when people in Ohio choose to give up their jobs in order to personally care for a spouse who was injured by someone else’s carelessness, they no longer have to give up the income they would have earned. Rick just wanted to care for his wife without jeopardizing the family’s finances, and now he and others like him can do just that.

More than money

Money aside, there’s a broader benefit to Maureen and Rick’s case. The court ruling ultimately helps promote closer marital relationships. It enables spouses to do what spouses should do, which is take care of each other. Today, Maureen is much improved. Recently, Rick was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease, and because of the care Maureen received now she’s able to help take care of him.

There’s no denying that there’s some sadness in Maureen and Rick Evans’ story. But it’s an uplifting story, too. And it’s a point of pride for the Evans and for us at Cooper & Elliott that other Ohio attorneys handling personal injury cases now use the ruling from Maureen and Rick’s case to help other families in the same difficult situation.

*Names in this article have been changed to protect our client’s privacy. 

The outcome of any client’s case will depend on the particular legal and factual circumstances of the case.


Connect with us

Beyond Civil Litigation: Healing After Justice is Served

Posted on Tue, Dec 23, 2014 @ 9:59 AM

The case that follows tragically demonstrates the obstacles clients and their civil litigation lawyers face when trying to reach a positive long-term outcome beyond the courtroom.

A good worker under bad circumstances

Josh* was a meat inspector with the United States Department of Agriculture. He was a great guy: young, idealistic, dedicated. In addition, his strapping 6-foot-4 frame meant he wasn’t easily intimidated – excellent qualities for someone holding the line on USDA policy to ensure that the country’s food supply remained safe.

He was assigned to a hog-slaughtering operation in northern Ohio after complaints had come in that previous inspectors had been taking bribes to look the other way. Immediately he began seeing problems: labor laws seemed to be flouted, and diseased or injured animals were regularly slaughtered, a direct violation of USDA regulations.

Josh, of course, called attention to these things, which slowed down operations and effectively increased costs. Frustrated by Josh’s dedication to his job, the owner of the plant, who authorities in the area suspected was connected to organized crime, began concocting ways to get Josh to quit.

There was a long list of measures the owner took to harass and intimidate Josh. The owner registered complaints about Josh to his congressman and other authorities. He installed surveillance cameras where Josh worked. One day Josh’s car was sprayed with dirt and gravel. Another time, Josh found drugs that had been planted in his car.

Throughout it all, Josh was a rock. Unfazed.

Then things got really nasty. After the plant owner had a henchman swear out a complaint that Josh had solicited him for a sex act, the town’s sheriff – an elected official whose biggest contributor was the meatpacking plant – had him arrested. Josh was left handcuffed to a pole, standing in the middle of the sheriff’s department, for hours. Splashed across the headlines the next day was “Meat Packing Inspector Arrested for Soliciting Sex,” courtesy of the plant owner, who had contacted media outlets.

Providing civil litigation for a defamation victim

Because Josh was a federal employee, the U.S. Attorney’s Office stepped in to defend him, and the charges were quickly dropped – they had all been fabricated. Our firm became involved when Josh decided to file a defamation complaint against the meatpacking plant.

We filed lawsuits and obtained a great deal of background information and discovery, then pursued civil litigation in federal court. We’d been scheduled for trial, when the judge invited the parties to conduct what’s called a summary jury trial.

With a summary jury trial, a jury is summoned and presented evidence in a much abbreviated form and over the course of a few days instead of a week or more, and the jury believes that it’s hearing a real lawsuit. Then it deliberates and issues a nonbinding decision, which gives the parties an idea of how an actual trial might proceed.

The summary jury listened to the evidence we presented and awarded Josh a $1 million verdict for defamation and psychological harm. Not surprisingly, the meatpacking plant owner realized he had no chance of successfully defending himself in civil court, so the case was quickly settled after that.

Tragedy beyond the courtroom

The story should have ended there, but sadly, Josh’s ordeal had only just begun. The stress of the phony solicitation allegations caused Josh – an outdoorsy guy, seemingly invincible – to suffer an incredible psychological break. He was diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and the results were devastating.

How does one adequately describe the slow, gradual decay of a human being’s psyche? There was paranoia, divorce, anger issues. Sobbing phone calls from a man unable to reconcile his powerful emotions.

We tried to bring in family members who could provide support, and we encouraged him when he started seeing a psychiatrist. Gradually, though, in spite of our attempts to help him and stay in touch, we lost track of Josh.

About four years after the case ended, we got the worst imaginable news. In Michigan, where he had moved, Josh had apparently barricaded himself and his girlfriend in a house. Police were called and there had been a standoff, and then the unthinkable had happened: Josh killed his girlfriend and himself.

Trying to heal

This is one of those tragedies that will live with us forever. As lawyers, we know we did all we could, working within the civil justice system to get justice for Josh and the best possible settlement. And we know we did the best we could outside of the courtroom, too – guiding him to counseling, providing support, and just being there for him when his anxiety became overwhelming.

Our involvement with him wasn’t at all unusual.  We try to have close associations with our clients that last well beyond their cases, and we try to help them look beyond the litigation.

Frequently, we’ll tell them, “You can’t let the litigation drive your life and you can’t live your life according to the outcome of the case, because who knows the outcome of a lawsuit?” We’re always worried that clients will delay the healing or grieving process, not allowing closure until the lawsuit comes to an end.

If we think it will help, we’ll encourage them to seek family counseling, or marital counseling, or vocational counseling, or vocational training – whatever it takes to find a way to move beyond their misfortune and pain and live the life they intended.

Yet for all that, Josh – a good man, a client, and a friend of ours – is dead. And in spite of all we did, it’s almost impossible to not feel as if we somehow failed him. It’s something we will never get over.

Recovering through relationships

So we work tirelessly.  We do everything in our power to build meaningful relationships with our clients so that we can understand not just their legal needs, but their underlying emotional and psychological needs as well.

When we talk with them, we’re truly listening so that we can recognize those needs and help find the resources they will need to move forward with their lives.  That may be mental health professionals, clergypersons, or even financial counselors. And we’re familiar with the symptoms associated with PTSD, as well as professionals in the area who are trained to treat it.

We’re not doctors or psychiatrists or mental health professionals, but at the same time we recognize, first and foremost, that clients are people, just like us. We recognize that each client is someone who is navigating a devastating chapter in their life, which is why we take our responsibility as attorneys and counselors so seriously.

*Names in this article have been changed to protect our client’s privacy. 

The outcome of any client’s case will depend on the particular legal and factual circumstances of the case.


Connect with us

How Justice, Compensation, and Listening Helped a Family Heal After a Wrongful Death

Posted on Thu, Dec 11, 2014 @ 4:41 PM

It was a family’s worst nightmare.

Around 5:00 one morning, Genie Henderson*, a 21-year-old with a job at a senior living facility, was on her way to work driving northbound on the local highway. She had no way of knowing that a drunk driver, having mistaken an exit ramp for an on-ramp, was driving southbound on that very same road at 60 mph. He came up over a hill and hit her head on.

She died immediately.

She left behind Joe, her fiancé, and their 1-year-old son, Sam, but also some profound questions: How could this have happened? Was it preventable? And how would Genie’s life have unfolded if this tragedy had never taken place?

Some people hearing about an accident like this might say, “Ah, a drunk driver. Probably didn’t have insurance. Case over.” But we felt we could help Joe and Sam heal from the loss of Genie, especially if we could answer some of those questions raised by her wrongful death.

Analyzing a wrongful death

What we learned was startling.

We discovered that the man responsible for Genie’s death had been arrested for drunken driving 10 times, including once just before this accident. How was that even possible? After all, standard procedure is for the police department to take away a person’s driver’s license, physically remove the license plate from his car, and impound the vehicle until a court order says it can be safely released.

Here, however, although the drunk driver had initially been put in jail, he’d been released less than 48 hours later and given his car back. He promptly went out, got drunk again, and forever changed the future of this innocent young family.

Our investigation found that the police department had released the man essentially for no good reason other than expediency. He had been a constant nuisance while in jail, so they let him out and gave him his car simply to make their own lives easier.

Understanding our clients’ needs

Needless to say, Genie’s family wanted justice. It was very important to them that a message was sent to the community so that this kind of tragedy would never be repeated.

The outcome of the case sent a very clear signal that drunken driving is a real crime with horribly real consequences, and that there should be zero tolerance of this behavior. The message extended to law enforcement too: drunk drivers are dangerous criminals and should be treated as such, not released on a whim or for convenience.

Genie’s family also needed compensation for their suffering and loss. But what some people don’t understand is that getting the largest award possible is never our clients’ primary objective. It’s always about something more fundamental: making sure those responsible are held accountable; making sure the victim’s death wasn’t in vain; speaking on behalf of the victim to give him or her a voice.

We talked with Genie’s family and friends to learn more about her and what her wishes might have been for her family. And we talked with them just to get to know them better and help them through a very painful time. Through our discussions, it became clear that a major priority was to ensure Genie’s son was provided for, so we sought an award that would take care of him into the future, including funds to pay for a college education.

Rewarding work

Every so often, we’ll check to see how Genie’s family is doing. Sam, that little 1-year-old, is now in high school and a soccer star. He plays goalie. Soon he’ll get the college education his mom always wanted for him.

It’s gratifying to know how our work helped honor the wishes of Genie’s family and get them back on their feet. And it’s even more gratifying because we’re invested in them not just as clients, but as people people with feelings who needed our help and compassion, and whom we wanted to see heal and ultimately thrive.

*Names in this article have been changed to protect our client’s privacy. 

The outcome of any client’s case will depend on the particular legal and factual circumstances of the case.


Connect with us

Touching Lives: The Human Inspiration for Us as Personal Injury Attorneys

Posted on Thu, Dec 11, 2014 @ 4:13 PM

If you ask personal injury attorneys what motivates them in their profession, chances are you’ll hear a range of responses, from the pursuit of justice to winning big settlements. But one of our most compelling reasons for doing this kind of work is the genuine desire to help people in need—to help a person put his or her life back on track after a devastating event. Here’s one of those stories.

David: In Need of a Personal Injury Attorney

A few years ago, David* had a lawsuit pending in Federal Court, and he urgently needed a new attorney.

His case, involving police misconduct, was shocking. He had suffered a spinal injury from officers who mistreated him while he was in handcuffs. Temporarily unable to use his arms or legs, he had literally been dragged into a jail cell by the police as he yelled for help, telling them that his neck was broken. Eventually a civilian employee at the jail, breaking down in tears, convinced a supervisor to bring in medical help. David was transported to a hospital, where a neurosurgeon was able to preserve his ability to use his legs and arms—but only partially. Because of this incident, David suffered permanent nerve damage that would limit full use of his limbs for the rest of his life.

As troubling as this story was, we wanted to take David’s case only if we could make a difference. Deadlines were approaching very quickly, and court orders said that his case would soon be dismissed. But we also realized that, through no fault of his own, David wasn’t getting adequate representation. His personal injury attorney at the time, while very knowledgeable in general, simply didn’t have experience in this area of law. We did, so we jumped in with both feet.

Experience Makes the Difference

Once we got involved, we quickly went to work on a number of fronts:

  • We obtained more time. We approached the court to arrange for more time so we could identify experts and comply with the court’s order. Extra time would be crucial for us to address and present the merits of David’s case properly. Fortunately, the court agreed.
  • We located experts. Because of our experience in this area, we knew of well-respected national experts who could assist us in what looked to be a technically-challenging case. We needed medical experts. We needed people with expertise in determining how much force is considered excessive for the purposes of law enforcement. So we lined up specialists capable of providing valuable, authoritative testimony.
  • We took police testimony. When we took the case, no testimony had been taken from any police officers. Based on our experience, we knew what questions had to be asked and what answers had to be obtained in order to hold the right people responsible for David’ injuries. Having control over that gave us a considerable advantage when preparing for trial.
  • We researched the case thoroughly. Even in areas of case law in which we have vast experience, we prefer to go back to the books, research the cases, and ensure that we’re fully up to date so that when we do take testimony from witnesses, we’re asking the questions we know the court or jury would ask.    
  • We understood the full extent of damages. We prepared to address some very sophisticated legal arguments: How is excessive force defined? Was excessive force used in David’s case? If so, what are the right damages? A personal injury attorney has only one opportunity to get this right. It’s critical to know the full extent of a client’s harm and, most importantly, how much it’s going to cost to care for our client for the rest of his or her life.

David: Not Just a Case

We also helped David in a less tangible, but perhaps even more meaningful, way: we treated him like a human being and not just a ‘case’.

David was a fairly young man with few family members to support him, disabled by the police, and worried about how he would care for his children. His life had taken a dramatic negative turn. That’s a scary place to be, and something no person should have to manage alone.

Throughout his case, and even afterward, we became David’s closest confidantes —friends, sounding boards, people he could trust. That extended to our entire firm as well, with David becoming a part of our family throughout the course of the lawsuit.

Sure, talking to experts and writing briefs is important, but often our job is also about spending hours counseling our clients, offering compassion, and just helping them navigate a terrible chapter in their lives.

Fortunately, our involvement brought a happy outcome. We successfully reshaped David’s case and got it ready for trial. Literally days before the trial was scheduled to start, the police department asked to settle the case for an amount that ensured David could care for himself and his children for the rest of his life. 

Bending the Arc of Justice

It was gratifying to know we had helped bring some form of justice — or at least accountability — in the wake of David’s mistreatment. But consider where he would be now without having had experienced representation. What would his life be like? What would life be like for his children?

We took a case that had literally been on the brink of failure and turned it into a multimillion-dollar recovery that’s being used to care for a person who was severely and permanently injured. That’s what motivates us most as personal injury attorneys. For all the legal victories, it’s the important human stories behind them that inspire us most.

Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.” Sometimes we have to pound like heck on that arc just to get it to bend even a little. But it’s awfully gratifying when you know you’ve played a role in pointing it in the right direction.

*Names in this article have been changed to protect our client’s privacy. 

The outcome of any client’s case will depend on the particular legal and factual circumstances of the case.

Topics: ,

Connect with us

Justice for a Wrongful Death Sabotaged By Irresponsibility

Posted on Tue, Dec 9, 2014 @ 11:14 AM

One summer day, Jim Harrison*, 45, a married father of two young girls, noticed water dripping from the ceiling, so he went up to the attic to take a look. The source of the water, it turned out, was a leaking condensation pump from an attic-mounted air-conditioning unit they’d been having problems with. Unbeknownst to Jim, the business that had installed and later unsuccessfully attempted to fix the AC unit (we’ll call the firm “AC Company”) had also left an electrical socket exposed and open, without a plastic guard to protect the wiring.

Continue reading Justice for a Wrongful Death Sabotaged By Irresponsibility


Connect with us

Healing the Scars: Helping a Car Accident Survivor Move Forward from a Devastating Crash

Posted on Tue, Dec 2, 2014 @ 9:53 AM

How many times have you hopped into your car with friends or family to go get something to eat? Would you ever imagine that one of those times a member of your group would be killed in a car accident, and that you would have to bear the scars of the tragedy for the rest of your life?

Sarah Alvarez* never imagined such a thing would happen—until a negligent uninsured motorist changed her life forever. 

Five people were in the car: Alice* (Sarah’s sister), who was driving; Sarah, riding in the passenger seat; and Alice’s three children, riding in back.

The uninsured motorist hit them head-on, killing Alice on impact. The tremendous force of the collision caused Alice’s car to roll over several times and Alice’s body to come free from her seat belt. As the car came to rest on the passenger side, Alice’s body landed across Sarah, who was trapped in her seat. Sarah had to wait for what seemed an eternity, her sister’s lifeless body lying across her, before they could be freed from the wreckage.

Amazingly, there was some good news: The three children in back escaped physical injury, though they now faced the prospect of life without their mother. And Sarah, in spite of the nightmare she’d endured, also emerged with few physical injuries, save for a large gash across her forehead.

But the physical scar from that wound, not to mention the emotional scars from the whole experience, would remain with her long after the accident.

A Life Changed Forever

We sought compensation for Sarah based on the scar she sustained and the emotional nightmare associated with it. Every time she looked in the mirror and saw the scar at the top of her forehead, she relived the accident, the memory of her sister lying lifeless on top of her, of being trapped there, helpless to do anything for Alice.

The heartbreak and anxiety resulting from the crash was obvious. Sarah was no longer the bubbly, energetic teenage girl she’d been before the accident. Now she was downcast, rarely looking up at people, and extremely self-conscious about that scar, always trying to hide it with her hair.

Car Accident Victims vs. Insurance Companies

On behalf of Sarah, we first sued the driver who hit Alice’s car, but he was uninsured.  That forced us to sue the insurance company that had issued Alice and Sarah their uninsured motorist coverage. This might seem a bit odd—suing your client’s own insurance company—but it’s common in personal injury or car accident lawsuits.

In our experience, no matter whose insurance company it is, at the end of the day an insurance company is interested in one thing: making money. Even if you’ve been a loyal customer paying premiums on time over several years, and even if you’ve suffered serious injuries, they will do their best to pay out as little as possible on your claim.

Sarah’s insurance company initially offered her $10,000, which was a ridiculously low sum given what Sarah had endured—and what she still faced going forward. So we chose to let a jury decide what was fair. At trial, the insurance company’s lawyer downplayed Sarah’s scar and told the jury that it was hardly noticeable. We reminded the jury that a scar is only small when it’s on someone else’s face. The jury gave the highest verdict for a case involving a scar in the county’s history.

Obtaining the Greater Good

While we were happy with the jury’s verdict, our satisfaction really had less to do about the size of the award, and more about obtaining justice for a young woman devastated by a car accident. We hoped we could help bring some measure of closure so she could move forward.

All of this should be no surprise. When you put yourself in the shoes of clients and start to feel what they’re experiencing—all of the emotions, the grief of losing a loved one—you can’t help but be moved to do everything you possibly can for them.

And we weren’t the only ones moved by Sarah’s situation. One unforgettable scene at the end of the trial really hit home how much Sarah had been affected, and how much others wanted to help. After the jury found in Sarah’s favor, some women from the jury came down from where they’d been seated, hugged her, and said to this dejected, self-conscious young woman, “Listen. You look up at people. Look them in the eye. You’re a beautiful young girl and don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.”

It was a powerful moment.

A Young Life Moves Forward

Helpful, supportive words like those, as well as the closure that comes from seeing justice done, have had a wonderfully positive impact for Sarah as she’s struggled to create a new life for herself after surviving the car accident.

She’s since finished school and entered the workplace, and she’s done the best she can to put her tragedy behind her. We still talk a lot with her brother, Andres*, and he tells us she’s doing well.

And that’s really all we can ask for. Let’s face it: After a traumatizing experience like what Sarah went through, nobody can expect her to simply forget what happened. It will always be with her on some level—just like that scar.

But the positive outcome in a case like this often enables people who’ve suffered horrible tragedies to recognize that they’ve done everything they can for their lost loved one and their family, and it’s OK to move forward. 

*Names in this article have been changed to protect our client’s privacy. 

The outcome of any client’s case will depend on the particular legal and factual circumstances of the case.


Connect with us

Honoring a Victim and Her Survivors in a Wrongful Death Case

Posted on Tue, Nov 18, 2014 @ 2:00 PM

We think it’s critical to remember what this statistic represents: each alcohol-related death happened to a special person with hopes, dreams, and goals someone with loved ones whose lives will forever be affected by such a tragedy. So as wrongful death attorneys, we always want to learn as much as possible about the individuals involved. That way we can obtain the best possible outcome for all.

A family is forever changed

Continue reading Honoring a Victim and Her Survivors in a Wrongful Death Case


Connect with us

Helping One Family Move On After a Wrongful Death

Posted on Fri, Nov 14, 2014 @ 10:11 AM

It’s a natural human tendency to make assumptions and draw conclusions based on preconceived ideas or personal biases. One wrongful death case of ours not only illustrates this tendency, but demonstrates that some good can come from a tragedy as long as we set our preconceived notions aside and invest some extra time to discover the underlying facts of a case. 

Death of a child

This case involved a 9-year-old boy named John*. One afternoon John was playing with two of his friends at a vacant house in his impoverished neighborhood. Because the house was in disrepair, one of John’s friends was able to pull a spindle from the porch’s railing. For fun, the friend used the spindle to bang on one of the porch supports, which eventually gave way, causing the roof to collapse, crushing John and killing him.

It was a deep tragedy. And when John’s family sought legal support from several other wrongful death attorneys, they were told there wasn’t a case—that the boys were vandalizing the property and that such an event, albeit tragic, was essentially their own fault. 

Fortunately, for a number of reasons we took the case and, in the process, uncovered the truth underlying this tragedy.

Continue reading Helping One Family Move On After a Wrongful Death


Connect with us